Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462359›Full record

ReviewGenome biology and evolution2025

Genome Mountaineering: Expanding Horizons of the 3D Genome for the Intrepid Evolutionary Adventurer.

Ava Mackay-Smith, Gregory A Wray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ava Mackay-SmithDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0404-0563
Gregory A WrayDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5634-5081

Funding

National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship IOS-2110533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical positioning of DNA in 3D space within the nucleus can be important for understanding how genetic changes influence gene regulation and consequently phenotype. The costs of 3D genomic assays are falling, concomitant with the rapid innovation of newer, more customizable methods. Thus, evolutionary researchers are increasingly able to engage with these approaches as barriers diminish. As we apply these methods to a broader range of organisms, we learn more about principles governing genome structure and regulatory evolution in 3D space. Here, we use recent studies in primarily nonmodel organisms to illustrate how these approaches can provide novel insights into evolutionary processes. We focus on these cases as motivation for further research into evolutionary conservation and change in 3D organization; the relationship between 3D organization and structural changes in the genome; and the impact of 3D organization in the evolution of gene regulation and organismal traits. We argue that 3D genomic information can help resolve a wide range of outstanding questions in evolutionary biology, particularly as technologies improve and become more accessible in nonmodel systems.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeGenomicsAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumans3D genomechromatin conformation captureevolutionary geneticsHi-C

Identifiers

PMID40462359
PMCPMC12204199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.