ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
A three-part model for the self-controlled case series design to estimate and characterize adverse event risk in an overlapping risk period after multiple vaccines: application to ischemic stroke following Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and influenza vaccine.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible and Interpretable Modeling of Overlapping Exposure Risks in Self-Controlled Case Series Analysis.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Thrombophilia and Folate Cycle Gene Polymorphisms in the Development of Ischemic Stroke After COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a three-part model to assess and characterize the risk of serious adverse events when 2 vaccines are administered on the same day or in close proximity within a self-controlled case series framework. Simulations showed that the three-part model yielded unbiased relative incidences (RIs) after each vaccination and during the overlapping risk period, while censoring follow-up at dose 2 reduced estimation precision but produced unbiased point estimates. Assuming positive multiplicative and positive additive effects, including the overlapping risk period in the first risk interval overestimated the RI after the first dose by 6.0%-26.0%, while including it in the second overestimated the second RI by 7.3%-34.0%. Overall analysis using the three-part model found no increased ischemic stroke risk 42 days after Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccination or after influenza vaccination or during the overlapping risk period among Kaiser Permanente Southern California members <65 years. Among those with a prior-year history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the overlapping period showed a significantly increased risk (RI = 2.74 [95% CI, 1.07-7.07]), indicating both positive multiplicative and additive effects. Further research is needed to validate these ischemic stroke findings with chart review confirmation and to apply the model to other vaccination scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.