Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462345›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026

A three-part model for the self-controlled case series design to estimate and characterize adverse event risk in an overlapping risk period after multiple vaccines: application to ischemic stroke following Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and influenza vaccine.

Stanley Xu, Lina S Sy, Xuan Huang, Vennis Hong, Bing Han, Katia J Bruxvoort, Bruno Lewin, Kimberly J Holmquist, Lei Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stanley XuDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-7672
Lina S SyDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-9266
Xuan HuangDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Vennis HongDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Bing HanDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Katia J BruxvoortDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-2431
Bruno LewinDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1483-2791
Kimberly J HolmquistDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Lei QianDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.

Funding

A risk-varying and perturbed self-controlled case series design for assessing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in a large health care systemR01AI168209 · NIAID · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI XU, STANLEY · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI168209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a three-part model to assess and characterize the risk of serious adverse events when 2 vaccines are administered on the same day or in close proximity within a self-controlled case series framework. Simulations showed that the three-part model yielded unbiased relative incidences (RIs) after each vaccination and during the overlapping risk period, while censoring follow-up at dose 2 reduced estimation precision but produced unbiased point estimates. Assuming positive multiplicative and positive additive effects, including the overlapping risk period in the first risk interval overestimated the RI after the first dose by 6.0%-26.0%, while including it in the second overestimated the second RI by 7.3%-34.0%. Overall analysis using the three-part model found no increased ischemic stroke risk 42 days after Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccination or after influenza vaccination or during the overlapping risk period among Kaiser Permanente Southern California members <65 years. Among those with a prior-year history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the overlapping period showed a significantly increased risk (RI = 2.74 [95% CI, 1.07-7.07]), indicating both positive multiplicative and additive effects. Further research is needed to validate these ischemic stroke findings with chart review confirmation and to apply the model to other vaccination scenarios.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesIschemic StrokeAdultAgedCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRisk AssessmentCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza Vaccinescoadministrationinfluenza vaccinesischemic strokemRNA COVID-19 vaccinesoverlapping risk periodself-controlled case seriessimulationvaccine safety study

Identifiers

PMID40462345
PMCPMC13066344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.