Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462299›Full record

ArticleIntestinal research2026

The duration of prior anti-tumor necrosis factor agents is associated with the effectiveness of vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: a real-world multicenter retrospective study.

Taku Kobayashi, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Satoshi Motoya, Minoru Matsuura, Toshimitsu Fujii, Reiko Kunisaki, Tomoyoshi Shibuya, Ken Takeuchi, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hiroshi Yasuda and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intestinal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Taku KobayashiCenter for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadakazu HisamatsuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi MotoyaInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Minoru MatsuuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshimitsu FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Reiko KunisakiInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Tomoyoshi ShibuyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IBD Center, Tsujinaka Hospital Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Japan.
Sakiko HiraokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Hiroshi YasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Kaoru YokoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Noritaka TakatsuInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan.
Atsuo MaemotoInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Toshiyuki TaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Keiichi TominagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Masaaki ShimadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, NHO Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Nobuaki KunoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Mary CavaliereJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori IshiguroJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Jovelle L FernandezJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshifumi HibiCenter for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsPrevious literature suggests that the response of patients with ulcerative colitis to vedolizumab may be affected by previous biologic therapy exposure. This real-world study evaluated vedolizumab treatment effectiveness in biologicnon-naïve patients.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective, observational chart review of records from 16 hospitals in Japan (December 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020). Included patients who had ulcerative colitis, were aged ≥ 20 years, and received at least 1 dose of vedolizumab. Outcomes included clinical remission rates from weeks 2 to 54 according to prior biologic exposure status and factors associated with clinical remission up to week 54.

resultsA total of 370 eligible patients were included. Clinical remission rates were significantly higher in biologic-naïve (n=197) than in biologic-non-naïve (n=173) patients for weeks 2 to 54 of vedolizumab treatment. Higher clinical remission rates up to week 54 were significantly associated with lower disease severity (partial Mayo score ≤ 4, P= 0.001; albumin ≥ 3.0, P= 0.019) and the duration of prior anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) therapy (P= 0.026). Patients with anti-TNFα therapy durations of < 3 months, 3 to < 12 months, and ≥ 12 months had clinical remission rates of 28.1%, 32.7%, and 60.0%, respectively (P= 0.001 across groups).

conclusionsThe effectiveness of vedolizumab in biologic-non-naïve patients was significantly influenced by duration of prior anti-TNFα therapy. (Japanese Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT-1080225363).

Indexed as

Colitis, ulcerativeReal-world evidenceSequencingTumor necrosis factor-alphaVedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID40462299
PMCPMC13153848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.