Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462066›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

Two pediatric patients with secondary glioblastoma following radiotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case report.

Nanae Chiba, Noriyoshi Takahashi, Hiroaki Ogawa, Takaya Yamamoto, Rei Umezawa, Masayuki Kanamori, Hidenori Endo, Keiichi Jingu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nanae ChibaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1, Seiryou-Machi, Aobaku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan. nanae.chiba.e7@tohoku.ac.jp.
Noriyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1, Seiryou-Machi, Aobaku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Hiroaki OgawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan.
Takaya YamamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Rei UmezawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Masayuki KanamoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hidenori EndoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough radiation therapy (RT) has been established as a leading treatment for cancer patients, alongside surgery and chemotherapy, radiation itself is a well-known risk factor for carcinogenesis (Kamran et al., Cancer. 122(12):1809-21, 2016). A second malignant neoplasm may occur even with a small radiation dose (Diallo et al., Int J Radiat Oncol, 74(3):876-83, 2009). Relling et al. estimated that the cumulative risk of the development of malignant brain tumors following prophylactic cranial RT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients is around 0.5%-1.5% at 15 years (Walter et al., J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol, 16(12):3761-7, 1998). The most frequent tumor types of radiation-induced malignant brain tumors are meningioma, glioblastoma (GBM), and sarcoma (Onishi et al., 2024). GBM--the most aggressive type of glioma--is classified as a high-grade glioma as per the WHO classification of tumors (Holland, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(12):6242-4, 2000; Louis et al., Neuro-Oncol 23(8):1231-51, 2021). GBM still draws attention due to its poor prognosis. The median overall survival (OS) of adult patients with GBM is approximately 12 months, and less than 5% of the patients might survive more than 5 years (Hertler et al., Eur J Cancer 189:112,913, 2023). Whereas the definitive treatment for GBM patients is surgery, adjuvant RT, and chemotherapy, the appropriate re-irradiation dose for patients with radiation-induced GBM (RIGBM) is still controversial since a more critical decision on the radiation dose needs to be made considering that the incidence of brain necrosis increases as the radiation dose increases (Lawrence et al., Int J Radiat Oncol 76(3):S20-7, 2010). CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients at the age of 15 years were found to have RIGBM. The stable health duration until they developed RIGBM was 9-11 years after the first RT for ALL. Total resection was performed in Case 1 and a biopsy was first performed in Case 2 and then total resection was performed. Concurrent chemotherapy and external beam RT (50 Gy in 25 fractions for 5 weeks, 2 Gy in a dose per fraction) were performed in both patients. One patient (Case 1) survived without recurrence for more than 104 months after the initiation of radiation, whereas other patient died due to progression.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first case report on long-term survival of a young patient with RIGBM. This case report sheds light on long-term survivors among pediatric RIGBM and the optimal radiation dose in the settings of re-irradiation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCranial IrradiationGlioblastomaNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePrognosisAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaPediatric patientsRadiation-induced glioblastomaRe-irradiationSecondary malignant neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID40462066
PMCPMC12131411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.