Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462051›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2025

Survey methods contributing to the difference of dentin hypersensitivity prevalence among publications between 1998 and 2022: a research-on-research study.

Guanru Wang, Cheng Miao, Honglin Li, Guile Zhao, Chunjie Li

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guanru Wang *State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Cheng Miao *State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Honglin LiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Guile ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Chunjie LiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. lichunjie@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

2018 Sichuan University-Luzhou Municipal Government Strategic Cooperation Research 2018CDLZ-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) differed significantly among previous reports, which may confuse clinicians and public health practitioners. This study aimed to identify which survey methods contributed to the difference in reported DH prevalence.

methodsA systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, ProQuest, CNKI, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases up to November 2022. Two authors extracted the basic characteristics and survey methods independently. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to estimate the effects of survey methods on estimated DH prevalence. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was employed to appraise the methodological quality of the studies included in the analysis.

resultsThirty-nine studies were included. The average estimate of DH prevalence was 32% (95% CIs: 27 - 37%). The statistical heterogeneity was very high among studies (I

conclusionThe included studies demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in survey methods. Conducting clinical examinations for all participants enhanced detection rates. The reliability of our pooled prevalence estimates was substantially compromised due to the studies' low methodological quality and high heterogeneity. It is recommended to propose the instructive detailed guideline to standardize the design and improve the quality of studies.

Indexed as

Dentin SensitivityHumansPrevalenceDentin hypersensitivityEpidemiologyEvidence-based dentistryMethodsResearch design

Identifiers

PMID40462051
PMCPMC12135246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.