ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Finite element fracture load analysis and dark-field X-ray imaging of osteoporotic and healthy vertebrae in human lumbar spine specimens.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the association of measurements from a clinical X-ray dark-field prototype system and CT-based finite element analysis (FEA) in lumbar spine specimens. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective study, human cadaveric spine specimens (L2 to L4) were examined using a clinical prototype for dark-field radiography, yielding both attenuation and dark-field images. Specimens were scanned in vertical and horizontal positions. Volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) values were derived from quantitative CT measurements. Bone segmentation masks derived from CT-images were used for FEA-estimated fracture load (FL) calculations. FEA-estimated FL, dark-field, and attenuation signals were compared between osteoporotic/osteopenic (BMD < 120 mg/cm
resultsFifty-nine vertebrae from 20 lumbar spine specimens (mean age, 73 years ± 13; 11 women) were studied. FEA-estimated FL correlated with BMD (r = 0.75, p < .001) and was significantly lower in osteoporotic/osteopenic vertebrae (1222 ± 566 vs. 2880 ± 1182, p < .001). Dark-field and attenuation signals were positively correlated with FEA-estimated FL, in both vertical (r
conclusionDark-field and attenuation signals assessed using a clinical X-ray dark-field system significantly correlated with FEA-estimated FL in human spine specimens with and without osteoporosis/osteopenia. Dark-Field imaging may complement existing assessment methods for bone strength as a dose-efficient, accessible tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.