Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02644564 (Early Clinical Examination and Ultrasonography Screening of Acute Soft Tissue Shoulder Injuries), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Clinical Examination and Ultrasonography Screening of Acute Soft Tissue Shoulder Injuries
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRotator cuff tears may easily be missed in patients with acute shoulder trauma. The evidence in support of shoulder physical examination tests has been considered insufficient in reviews and meta-analyses. The purpose of this study was to explore whether physical examination tests can effectively predict or rule out acute full-thickness rotator cuff tears in soft tissue shoulder injuries in emergency departments and primary health care.
methodsIn a combined primary care walk-in clinic and secondary care orthopaedic emergency department, 120 consecutive patients aged ≥ 40 years with acute shoulder injury without fracture on plain x-rays were enrolled prospectively at the first follow-up within three weeks of the injury. Thirteen physical examination tests and ultrasound screening as reference standard, were performed blinded to each other.
resultsThe median age was 55 years, 51% were female. The prevalence of the target condition rotator cuff full-thickness tear and/or occult fracture of the insertion was 38% (n = 46; 38 tears and 8 occult avulsion fractures). Almost all tears involved the supraspinatus tendon (n = 36). The highest test accuracy was observed for the inability to abduct above 90°, resisted abduction pain and external rotation strength. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio of the inability to abduct the arm above 90 ° was 84% (95% CI 69-93), 71% (95% CI 59-82) and 12.9 (95% CI 4.8-34.2), respectively, and 66% (51-80), 86% (77-93) and 12.4 (5.0-30.8) for external rotation strength assessed by the small finger test. Combining the inability to abduct above 90° and weakness in external rotation improved the sensitivity to above 90% and the diagnostic odds ratio to above 22, but specificity decreased.
conclusionsThe present study suggests that two simple tests, the inability to abduct above 90° and weakness in external rotation may effectively predict full-thickness tears of the supra- and infraspinatus and/or occult fracture at their insertion in the acute phase of soft tissue shoulder injuries. The test combination may be useful for selecting patients for advanced imaging and for diagnostic purposes when such imaging is not available.
trial registrationThe Norwegian Regional Ethics Committee South East (2015/195) on 24th March 2015, and retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02644564) on 31st December 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.