ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
An extension of the Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones method for continuous covariates in clinical decision making.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is still demand for algorithms that can be used at the point of care, especially when dealing with events that do not present with a single obvious clinical indicator. The Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones (SKJ) method is an approach for the development of a clinical score that focuses on the effect size of predictors, which is more relevant in settings where events may be rare or data is scarce. However, it does require predictors to be binary or dichotomised.
methodsWe developed an extension of the Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones method that can include continuous variables and added additional features that make it more useful in a variety of settings. We illustrated our method on two historical datasets dealing with viral failure in HIV patients in Cambodia. We used area under the curve (AUC) and risk classification improvement (RCI) as metrics to evaluate the performance of resulting predictions scores and risk classifications.
resultsAll new features worked as intended. Scoring systems developed with the new method outperformed an earlier application of a classic version of SKJ method on the training dataset, while no significant difference was found on any of the performance measures in the test dataset.
conclusionsThis extension provides a useful tool for clinical decision-making that is much more flexible than the original version of SKJ, and can be applied in a variety of settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.