ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Efficient structure learning of gene regulatory networks with Bayesian active learning.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene regulatory network modeling is a complex structure learning problem that involves both observational data analysis and experimental interventions. Bayesian causal discovery provides a principled framework for modeling observational data, generating posterior distributions that best represent the underlying structure. While recent algorithms offer efficient and accurate structure learning, integrating experiment design can further enhance predictive performance.
resultsWe introduce novel acquisition functions for experiment design in gene expression data, leveraging active learning in both Essential Graph and Graphical Model spaces. We evaluate scalable structure learning algorithms within an active learning framework to optimize intervention selection. Our study explores existing active learning strategies, adapts techniques from other domains to structure learning, and proposes a novel approach using Equivalence Class Entropy Sampling (ECES) and Equivalence Class BALD Sampling (EBALD). Using DREAM4's Gene Net Weaver and Sachs protein signaling data, we assess the effectiveness of different strategies in improving network learning.
conclusionExisting Bayesian experiment design strategies often overlook the Essential Graph structure, making inference more challenging due to the large number of possible graphs. Our results demonstrate that integrating active learning into structure learning algorithms can significantly improve performance, offering a scalable and effective approach for gene regulatory network discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.