Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461981›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Relationship of LCL finding after post-op ACLR with anterior tibial translation, femorotibial rotation, knee scores, and functional performance: a retrospective cohort study.

Ahmet Serhat Genç, Mirsad Yalçınkaya, Egemen Ermiş, Enes Akdemir, Berna Anıl, Esra Korkmaz Salkılıç, Eren Şahin, Ali Kerim Yılmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmet Serhat GençDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, 55090, Türkiye.
Mirsad YalçınkayaDepartment of Radiology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, 55090, Türkiye.
Egemen ErmişFaculty of Yaşar Doğu Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55270, Türkiye.
Enes AkdemirFaculty of Yaşar Doğu Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55270, Türkiye.
Berna AnılFaculty of Yaşar Doğu Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55270, Türkiye.
Esra Korkmaz SalkılıçFaculty of Yaşar Doğu Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55270, Türkiye.
Eren ŞahinÇorum Guidance and Research Centre, Ministry of National Education, Çorum, 19100, Türkiye.
Ali Kerim YılmazFaculty of Yaşar Doğu Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55270, Türkiye. akerim.yilmaz@omu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to examine the relationships between anterior tibial translation (ATT) distance, femorotibial rotation (FTR) angle, coronal lateral collateral ligament (LCL) sign, and functional lower extremity results obtained from single leg hop tests (SLHT), which are indirect magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings used to assess knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear detection and ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsThis study included a total of 28 patients, 12 females (43%) and 16 males (57%), aged 18-40 years with ACL tear. Pre-operative (pre-op) ATT distance, FTR angle and LCL sign were measured by MRI, and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC) and Tegner Activity Score (TAS) were measured and recorded by patient self-assessment. At six months post-operatively (post-op), the SLHT test was conducted alongside the same measurements. Differences between pre-op and post-op results, as well as correlations between post-op test outcomes, were analyzed based on the presence of the LCL sign.

resultsAfter ACLR, there was no significant difference in ATT distance (p = 0.061) or FTR angle (p = 0.470) compared to the pre-op period. The presence of the post-op LCL sign did not lead to significant differences in ATT distance, FTR angle, LKSS, TAS, or any SLHT results (p > 0.05). However, the presence of LCL sign was associated with a significant increase in the IKDC scale (p = 0.047, ES=-0.78). In analyzing the correlations between ATT, FTR results, their changes, knee scores, SLHT results on the operative side, and limb symmetry index (LSI) ratios, significant correlations were found in various parameters for the entire group and the group without the LCL sign. In contrast, no significant correlations were found between any parameters in the group with the LCL sign (p > 0.05).

conclusionsACLR did not result in a significant change in indirect MRI findings (ATT distance, FTR angle, and LCL sign) at the 6-month post-op mark. Additionally, the LCL sign was not a distinguishing factor in knee scores or lower extremity functional performance at six months post-op. In order to understand the potential effects of the LCL finding, longer follow-up and studies evaluating various sub-parameters such as age, gender, different surgical techniques are needed.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionJoint InstabilityKnee JointTibiaAdolescentAdultFemaleFemurHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesRotationTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultACL reconstructionAnterior cruciate ligamentCoronal LCL signFunctional performance

Identifiers

PMID40461981
PMCPMC12135414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.