Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461964›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

A scalable distributed pipeline for reference-free variants calling.

Lorenzo Di Rocco, Umberto Ferraro Petrillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorenzo Di RoccoDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. lorenzo.dirocco@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8744-7048
Umberto Ferraro PetrilloDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

Sapienza Università di Roma RM12117A8720C2A0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecision medicine pipelines typically begin with variant calling to identify disease-related mutations for optimal treatment selection. Reference-free approaches assess variations in the genetic profiles of distinct individuals through the utilization of a De Bruijn graph. However, the timely analysis of large-scale sequencing data may be beyond the capabilities of single workstations, requiring alternative computational approaches.

resultsWe introduce the first-known distributed pipeline for detecting isolated SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms), by leveraging the computational resources of multiple machines in parallel. Our pipeline efficiently analyzes large datasets thanks to the usage of a distributed De Bruijn graph representation. Furthermore, we introduce a cluster-driven algorithm to partition the De Bruijn graph across multiple independent machines according to the inner structure of the sequences under analysis, thus further improving the scalability of our pipeline.

conclusionsThe results of our experiments, conducted on real-world datasets, show the good performance of our pipeline in terms of efficiency, output quality and scalability. Moreover, the reported results also confirm that the adoption of a specialized partitioning algorithm for the distributed representation of the De Bruijn graph leads to a relevant performance speed-up compared to using standard partitioning techniques.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareComputational genomicsDistributed computingVariants calling

Identifiers

PMID40461964
PMCPMC12131334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.