Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461961›Full record

Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2025

Enhancing emergency department triage for older patients: a prospective study on the integration of the identification of seniors at risk.

Lanxin Ouyang, Shuzhen Yu, Ziwei Hu, Yin Lin, Di Liu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lanxin Ouyang *Department of Emergency, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.
Shuzhen Yu *Department of Emergency, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.
Ziwei HuDepartment of Emergency, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.
Yin LinDepartment of Emergency, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.
Di LiuDepartment of Emergency, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China. 18627972328@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults are a growing demographic in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide, yet traditional triage systems often fail to account for their unique risks, leading to under-triage and adverse outcomes. The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool offers a pragmatic approach to enhance risk stratification, but its integration into ED triage systems remains underexplored.

methodsThis prospective single-center observational cohort study assessed older patients (≥ 65 years) using both the standard ED triage system and the ISAR scale. After a 30-day follow-up, triage levels were retrospectively adjusted upward by one level for patients with ISAR scores ≥ 2. The predictive accuracy of the revised triage system was compared to the original system using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsAmong 973 patients completing follow-up, 38.1% had an ISAR score ≥ 2. Older patients (≥ 75 years) were more likely to be classified as high risk and had significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes, including ICU admission and 30-day mortality. The revised triage system slightly improved discriminative ability in patients aged ≥ 65 years (AUC 0.697 to 0.714), with stable performance maintained in those aged ≥ 75 years (AUC 0.703). Sensitivity declined slightly, while specificity improved.

conclusionIntegrating ISAR into ED triage modestly enhanced the identification of older patients at risk for short-term adverse outcomes, particularly among those aged ≥ 65 years. These findings support the value of incorporating geriatric screening into routine triage to enable more tailored risk stratification. Further studies are needed to evaluate implementation feasibility across different healthcare settings and to inform integration into routine practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalGeriatric AssessmentTriageAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveEmergency department triageGeriatric emergency careOlder patientsRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40461961
PMCPMC12135277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.