Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461898›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Comparison of the quantification performance of thermal desorption GC-IMS and GC-MS in VOC analysis.

Hannah Schanzmann, Selina Gaar, Svenja Keip, Ursula Telgheder, Stefanie Sielemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah SchanzmannLaboratory of Applied Instrumental Analytical Chemistry, Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences, Hamm, 59063, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9188-4646
Selina GaarLaboratory of Applied Instrumental Analytical Chemistry, Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences, Hamm, 59063, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0475-2603
Svenja KeipLaboratory of Applied Instrumental Analytical Chemistry, Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences, Hamm, 59063, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0613-2305
Ursula TelghederFaculty of Chemistry, Instrumental Analytical Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45141, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-2989
Stefanie SielemannLaboratory of Applied Instrumental Analytical Chemistry, Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences, Hamm, 59063, Germany. stefanie.sielemann@hshl.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-524X

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0428C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reproducible quantification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is essential in environmental monitoring, clinical diagnostics, and quality control. Thermal desorption gas chromatography (TD-GC) is widely used for VOC analysis, often coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) for reliable identification. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) has gained attention for its high sensitivity and rapid detection. While GC-IMS and GC-MS are well established, TD-GC coupled to both IMS and MS has not been systematically investigated. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of a TD-GC-MS-IMS system, combining the strengths of both detectors. A mobile flow- and temperature-controlled sampling unit for TD tubes was developed for standardized applications, designed to introduce both gaseous and liquid samples. The long-term stability of TD-GC-IMS was assessed over 16 months with 156 measurement days using ketones. Relative standard deviations for signal intensities ranged from 3% to 13%, retention time deviations from 0.10% to 0.22%, and drift time deviations from 0.49% to 0.51%. Comparative evaluation showed IMS was approximately ten times more sensitive than MS, achieving limits of detections in the picogram/tube range. In contrast, MS exhibited a broader linear range, maintaining linearity over three orders of magnitude (up to 1000 ng/tube), while IMS retained linearity for one order of magnitude (e.g., 0.1 to 1 ng/tube for pentanal) before transitioning into a logarithmic response. To improve IMS quantification, a linearization strategy extended the calibration range from one to two orders of magnitude. These findings establish a standardized TD-GC-MS-IMS framework, improving reproducibility and comparability for clinical, environmental, and industrial VOC analysis.

Indexed as

Limit of detection and quantificationLong-term stabilityPrecision studySample collectionTD-GC-MS-IMSThermal desorption tubes

Identifiers

PMID40461898
PMCPMC12276119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.