SynthesisJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence ECGs performance in the diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome.
Synthesis in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current perspectives on risk prediction and genetic basis of Brugada syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrugada syndrome (BrS) is a serious condition linked to sudden cardiac death in individuals who are otherwise healthy. Notably, drug-induced BrS accounts for 50% to 70% of all documented cases. The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the analysis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) represents a promising approach for the detection of BrS. PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI models in diagnosing BrS through ECG analysis.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, focusing on AI-based models for ECG analysis related to BrS detection. Key outcomes measured included sensitivity, specificity, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was using Zhou and Dendukuri I
resultsOur analysis included six studies encompassing ECG data from 2,179 patients, all employing AI algorithms for ECG interpretation. The quantitative analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.898, a sensitivity of 78.9% (95% CI: 69.6 to 85.9), and a specificity of 87.7% (95% CI: 79.9 to 92.7). Notably, the sensitivity analysis without Zanchi et al., significantly reduced the heterogeneity (I
conclusionAI-driven ECG interpretation demonstrates to be a viable option in detecting BrS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40461897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.