ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025
Community-Based Participatory Research: Involving Young People with Lived Experiences of Problematic Sexual Behaviors.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community advisory boards bridge the gap between researchers and community members to yield the most informed and successful implementation of prevention services. Youth community advisory boards demonstrate the same research-community member benefit but forming them presents unique challenges that often limit their use. In this article, we present lessons learned from a participatory research study in which we engage young people with problematic sexual behaviors (PSB) in an anonymous community advisory board and interviews. After completing a survey, 16 interview participants and five advisory board members aged 14-21 with PSB were interviewed about the research process, providing insights into survey clarity and participant experiences. Data were analyzed using content analysis to identify key themes. Seven themes emerged from qualitative data analyses. Young people with PSB strongly support research on PSB and they are willing to discuss about sensitive and stigmatized topics. They are not harmed by engaging in these discussions and are capable of providing consent for their participation. Ensuring confidentiality is vital to creating a safe and ethical research environment. Creative communication methods are valuable for building trust and facilitating engagement, while establishing clear boundaries between researchers and participants is essential to maintaining professionalism and respect throughout. Limitations include small sample size, lack of early advisory board involvement, and constraints about participant verification and demographic data. This study highlights not only how to involve a vulnerable, at-risk community of young people in community-based participatory research on a highly stigmatized topic, but also the many benefits of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40461877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.