ArticleMikrochimica acta2025
Supramolecular solvent-based all-in-one extractions for comprehensive suspect screening of chemicals in food contact materials.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Green Analytical Workflows: Recent Advances in Sample Preparation and Instrumental Analysis of Food Contact Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Only a minimal fraction of the food contact chemicals (FCCs) estimated to be present in food contact materials (FCMs) have been ever detected (~ 3000 out of 100,000). Identifying as many FCCs as possible is imperative for evaluating their impact on human health. Supramolecular solvent (SUPRAS)-based all-in-one extractions are proposed for the first time for sample treatment of FCMs and combined with liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry for developing comprehensive suspect screening of FCCs. SUPRASs featuring inverted hexagonal and sponge-like nanostructures were investigated for this purpose. Those produced from 1-decanol in ethanol-water media, behaving as restricted access materials for macromolecules, showed excellent performance in terms of interference removal, reproducibility and number of features detected. Sample treatment was simple (only vortex-shaking and centrifugation is required), fast (FCC extraction and FCM cleanup were integrated in a single step) and sustainable (only 100 µL of SUPRAS per sample is required). An in-house suspect list containing 1389 chemicals was developed for FCCs identification. The approach developed was applied to determine 18 plastic- and Tetra-Brik-based FCMs. Twenty-nine FCCs (9 intentionally and 20 non-intentionally added substances; IAS/NIAS) belonging to eight chemical classes were identified. These FCCs featured a wide polarity range (log P - 5.2 to 9.8), thus proving the ability of SUPRASs to develop comprehensive extraction of FCCs and increase the chance of raising the number of FCCs identified (e.g., 18 out of the 29 FCCs found in this study have not been previously reported in FCMs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.