ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Predicting surgical intervention in paediatric cervical abscesses using machine learning: a comparative analysis.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPaediatric cervical abscesses necessitate careful assessment to determine appropriate treatment strategies. Some patients require surgical intervention, although conservative management is effective. However, the criteria for the surgical indications remain unclear. Machine learning models have demonstrated promise in improving diagnostic accuracy across different medical fields.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the use of machine learning models in predicting the requirement for surgical intervention in paediatric cervical abscesses and compare their performance with that of traditional logistic regression.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 55 paediatric patients diagnosed with cervical abscesses between 2010 and 2024. The patient demographics, clinical findings, laboratory data, and imaging characteristics were examined. Six predictive models were developed: logistic regression, Random Forest, Lasso regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Feature importance was examined to identify the main predictive factors.
resultsAmong all the factors, abscess size was the most significant predictor of surgical intervention. Machine-learning models, especially XGBoost, outperformed logistic regression, achieving the highest AUC, accuracy, and recall. Inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil count, also substantially contributed to the prediction accuracy.
conclusionMachine learning models, particularly XGBoost, provide superior predictive performance compared with logistic regression, providing a valuable tool for optimising treatment decisions in paediatric cervical abscesses. These models improve clinical decision-making by integrating multiple factors, decreasing unnecessary surgeries, and enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40461855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.