ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Aggression is not blind: dominance and social history modulate murine responses to social instigation.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleThe social instigation procedure is a behavioral model used to induce escalated aggression in male mice. In this procedure, a brief indirect encounter with a novel rival male (instigator) placed in a tube enhances aggression toward an intruder in the subsequent agonistic encounter. However, social factors that drive this pro-aggressive effect remain unclear.
objectivesThis study investigates how social novelty, familiarity, and dominant-subordinate hierarchy influence the pro-aggressive effect of social instigation.
methodsA male instigator in a perforated tube was placed in the test mouse’s home cage for 5 min, followed by the introduction of an intruder male to assess the test animal’s aggression. Different types of instigators were used to examine the roles of social novelty and dominance hierarchy. Aggressive behavior was compared to baseline aggression without social instigation.
resultsExposure to a novel male instigator escalated aggression, as indicated by shorter attack latency and increased frequency and duration of aggressive behaviors. In contrast, when a familiar intruder male was presented as the instigator, attack latency was reduced but the total amount of aggressive behaviors remained unchanged. When the instigator had an established dominant-subordinate relationship with the test mouse, aggressive behavior was not enhanced. However, when a familiar male without a prior dominant-subordinate relationship was used, aggressive behavior increased to levels comparable to those induced by a novel instigator.
conclusionsSocial novelty and an ambiguous social hierarchy of the instigator promote the pro-aggressive effect of social instigation in male mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.