ArticleNature biotechnology2026
Efficient mitochondrial A-to-G base editors for the generation of mitochondrial disease models.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Base editing for precision therapeutics.Cell genomics · 2026Review
- Adeno-Associated virus-based approaches for mitochondrial diseases: advances and challenges.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Harnessing mitochondrial genome editing for crop improvement: principles and applications.aBIOTECH · 2026Review
- Mitochondria-Targeted Nanotherapies in Aging Neurodegenerative Disorders: Emerging Prospects and Clinical Potential.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- High-diversity base mutagenesis via simultaneous adenine, cytosine and guanine editing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial Quality Control in Age-Related Diseases: From Molecular Architecture to Precision Therapeutics.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging therapeutic strategies for mitochondrial DNA-related diseases.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Review
- Gene Editing Technologies for Hereditary Hearing Loss: Prospects and Challenges.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Review
- Specific elimination of m.8993T>G mitochondrial haplotype in NARP cybrid cells by CRISPR-Cas9 system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Single-cell multi-omic analysis of mitochondrial mutational mosaicism and dynamics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advances in gene therapy for mitochondrial genetic disorders: current status and clinical implementation challenges.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Alterations in mitochondrial base editors enhance targeted editing efficiency for mouse model generation.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing A-to-G base editors for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are limited by low efficiency. We used directed evolution to discover variants of the TadA-8e base editors that have substantially increased activity and expanded targeting compatibility for both nuclear and mitochondrial adenine base editing, especially in previously unfavored sequence contexts. The engineered mtDNA editors (eTd-mtABEs) showed up to 87% editing efficiency in human cells, with greatly reduced DNA and RNA off-target effects. Strand-selective A-to-G editing was enhanced by an average of 3.2-fold with substitution of DddA to DNA nickases in eTd-mtABE backbones compared to mitochondrial ABEs. In rat cells, editing efficiencies of eTd-mtABEs were up to 145-fold higher compared to split DddA transcription activator-like effector-linked deaminase. We also generated rats with sensorineural hearing loss by installing targeted mutations with frequencies of up to 44% through embryonic injection. The developed eTd-mtABEs are efficient and precise mtDNA-engineering tools for basic research and translational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40461783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.