Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461740›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Patient-Clinician Sex and Race and/or Ethnicity Concordance and Adherence to Preventive Services Guidelines: MEPS 2018-2020.

Alexis L Green, Randy Le, Erik J Rodriquez, Anna M Nápoles, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable, Paula D Strassle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexis L GreenDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute On Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Randy LeDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute On Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Erik J RodriquezDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Anna M NápolesDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute On Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eliseo J Pérez-StableDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paula D StrassleDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute On Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. pdstrass@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1072-1560

Funding

Office of the Scientific DirectorZICMD000017 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI CHOI, KELVIN · 2020 to 2025
$34.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MD000017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-clinician sex, racial, and ethnic concordance have been shown to improve healthcare utilization, but the impact of each on adherence to preventive services guidelines among specific populations remains unclear.

objectiveTo estimate the association between patient-clinician sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance and adherence to preventive services guidelines.

designCross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2018, 2020).

participantsAdults ≥ 18 years old who reported having a usual healthcare clinician. Adults who identified as multiracial, identified their clinician as being multiracial, or who did not report clinician sex, race, or ethnicity were excluded. MAIN MEASURES: Adherence to preventive services guidelines for influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines; breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening; and blood pressure and cholesterol screening. Predicted marginal prevalences and prevalence ratios were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographics, chronic conditions, and self-reported health status. KEY

resultsFemales were less likely to report sex concordance compared to males (52.5% vs. 69.8%, p < 0.01). Among females, sex concordance increased influenza (PR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.04-1.12), pneumococcal (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11), and shingles (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.17) vaccination, as well as breast (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.10), cervical (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.05-1.13), and colorectal (PR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.10) cancer screening, but not among males. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among American Indian and Alaska Native, Black, Latino, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander patients (< 25%) and was not associated with adherence in preventive services.

conclusionsFemales with female clinicians are more likely to adhere to preventive services guidelines. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was not associated with adherence to preventive services guidelines, but racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among non-White patients. Sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance may be a powerful tool for increasing preventive services utilization, but increased racial and/or ethnic concordance is needed to reach more definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

EthnicityGuideline AdherencePhysician-Patient RelationsPreventive Health ServicesRacial GroupsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adultcancer screeningconcordanceethnicitypreventive servicesracesexvaccination

Identifiers

PMID40461740
PMCPMC12332972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.