Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461712›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Artificial intelligence for streamflow prediction in river basins: a use case in Mar Menor.

Alejandro Cisterna-García, Aurora González-Vidal, Antonio Martínez-Ibarra, Yu Ye, Antonio Guillén-Teruel, Luis Bernal-Escobedo, Antonio F Skarmeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alejandro Cisterna-GarcíaDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Aurora González-VidalDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Antonio Martínez-IbarraDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain. antonio.martinezi@um.es.
Yu YeDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Antonio Guillén-TeruelDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Luis Bernal-EscobedoDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Antonio F SkarmetaDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain.

Funding

HORIZON-MSCA-2021- SE-01-01 Cloudstars (g.a. 101086248)MCIN with funding from European Union NextGenerationEU (PRTR-C17.I1) and by Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia - Fundación Séneca and 21591/FPI/21 ThinkInAzul programmeMICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ESF+ RYC2023-043553-IMICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and FEDER/EU PDC2023-145924-I00 (VINCI)MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and FEDER/EU PID2023-148104OB-C43 (ONOFRE4)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streamflow prediction is crucial for efficient water resource management, flood forecasting and environmental protection. This is even more important in areas particularly vulnerable to environmental changes such our study area-the Mar Menor basin in the Region of Murcia, Spain-with a specific emphasis on the Albujón watercourse, a significant contributor to the Mar Menor. Utilizing data from stream gauge stations, nearby rain gauge stations, and piezometers, our research forecasts streamflow at two critical points: "La Puebla" and "Desembocadura" along the watercourse. Targeting short-term forecasts of 1, 12, and 24 hours, our study employs Machine and Deep Learning techniques after data preprocessing, which includes station selection, data granularity adjustment, and feature selection. A state-of-the-art data augmentation technique was used to balance periods of low and high streamflow. Results show that Random Forest slightly outperforms LSTM for 1-hour forecasts (NSE > 0.89, MAE < 0.01), while Long Short Term Memory with data augmentation excels for 12 and 24-hour forecasts (NSE > 0.12, MAE < 0.05). This is noteworthy in areas with torrential rains causing rapid streamflow increases, a more challenging yet less studied scenario in forecasting. The findings contribute to addressing the challenges associated with streamflow prediction in vulnerable regions.

Identifiers

PMID40461712
PMCPMC12134185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.