Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461692›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An applied study of phacoemulsification cataract surgery with the mortise and tenon limbal incision.

Ruibo Chen, Tao Xu, Chunyan Xi, Kejun Liu, Kai Hu, Bing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruibo ChenSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Tao XuGuanghua Optometry Eye Hospital, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Chunyan XiPurui Eye Hospital, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Kejun LiuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Kai HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, China. hukai70@163.com.
Bing ChenPurui Eye Hospital, Changzhou, 213003, China. chenbing751@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study aims to evaluate the design, intraoperative stability, and postoperative anterior chamber sealing efficacy of mortise and tenon limbal incisions (MTLIs) compared to clear corneal incisions (CCIs) in phacoemulsification cataract surgery, focusing on its safety and effectiveness. 564 patients (MTLI = 282, CCI = 282) undergoing phacoemulsification were stratified by Emery-Little nuclear grades (III-V). Primary outcomes included stromal hydration necessity and more than 3 intraoperative anterior chamber collapses. Secondary outcomes assessed complications, such as Descemet membrane detachment, DMD). MTLI significantly reduced stromal hydration rates (Grade III: 7.06% vs. 55.74%; Grade IV: 18.87% vs. 83.67%; Grade V: 61.02% vs. 100%; p < 0.0001) and anterior chamber collapses (Grade III: 11.18% vs. 58.47%; Grade IV: 22.64% vs. 87.76%; Grade V: 62.71% vs. 100%; p < 0.0001) compared to CCI. No DMD occurred with MTLI, while two cases arose with CCI. MTLI demonstrates superior performance over CCI in terms of intraoperative and postoperative stability, reducing the need for stromal hydration and lowering the risk of anterior chamber collapse. This technique is easy to learn, beneficial for both novice and experienced surgeons, and offers significant clinical advantages without additional financial burden to the patient.

Indexed as

CataractLimbus CorneaePhacoemulsificationAgedAged, 80 and overAnterior ChamberFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCataractClear corneal incisionsMortise and tenon limbal incisionsPhacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID40461692
PMCPMC12134186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.