Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461683›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Assessing the utility of MRI‑based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and CT-derived Hounsfield Units for predicting cervical screw loosening.

Yitong Zhou, Wu Ye, Yao Gu, Xuhui Ge, Junjun Xiong, Pengyu Tang, Xiaokun Wang, Yu Gao, Haofan Wang, Wei Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yitong Zhou *Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Wu Ye *Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Yao Gu *Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Xuhui GeDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Junjun XiongDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Pengyu TangDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaokun WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Yu GaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Haofan WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Weihua CaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China. caiwhspine@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of using MRI-based Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) scores and CT-derived Hounsfield Units (HU) as predictive tools for cervical screw loosening (CSL) in patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Additionally, it analyzes the relationship between VBQ scores, HU values, and DXA T scores.

methodsA total of 112 patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) between December 2016 and January 2023 were followed for over a year and divided into CSL and non-CSL. The radiological and clinical parameters investigated included age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, VBQ scores, HU values, and DXA T scores.

resultsAmong the 112 patients included in the study, 18 patients developed cervical screw loosening postoperatively (16.07%). The lumbar T-score in the CSL group (-1.98 ± 1.06) was significantly lower than that in the non-CSL group (-1.53 ± 0.83), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The screw loosening rate was higher in osteoporotic patients than in non-osteoporotic patients, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Differences were observed in the mean HU values of C2-C7, C2-7, and the surgical segments between the two groups (p < 0.05). The VBQ score in the CSL group (3.12 ± 0.55) was significantly higher than that in the non-CSL group (2.42 ± 0.45), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001).

conclusionHigher VBQ scores and lower HU values are associated with an increased risk of cervical screw loosening. Significant correlations exist among DXA T scores, cervical VBQ scores, and HU values.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone ScrewsCervical VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingProsthesis FailureSpinal FusionAdultAgedDiskectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedACDFBone qualityCervical screw looseningCTMRIROC analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.