ArticleScientific reports2025
Sugar management and photosynthesis of sugar beet after infection by Cercospora beticola.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Structural, Physiological, and Molecular Assessment of Sugar Beet Infested byAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Diel Measurement Timing, Dark Acclimation and Sample Handling Alter Interpretation of OJIP Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Under Field Conditions.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris) is an important crop used not only in sugar production but also as the source of biogas and bioethanol, as a substrate in the petrochemical industry, and as a bio-resource for additional industrial and chemical feedstocks. Sugar beet is sensitive to environmental stress factors, including fungal infections such as Cercospora beticola (CLS-Cercospora leaf spot disease). Despite the introduction of plant cultivars with increased resistance to this disease, it causes a significant reduction in crop yield every year. The effect of infection is significant leaf loss in July and August, and the leaf rosette regeneration in September lasts until November. We examined three varieties of sugar beet with increased resistance to CLS. Using satellite images, we monitored the rate of leaf regeneration after CLS infection and studied in detail the gas exchange of plants, the efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus, changes in the content of pigments and sugars in leaves, and sugar storage in roots. We showed for the first time that leaf regeneration after CLS infection seems independent of sugar accumulated in the roots. Sugar beetroot varieties were characterized by different strategies for managing sugar production and relocation. Moreover, the efficiency of CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.