ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of mesoporous silica synthesized for green adsorption by modeling via machine learning and mass transfer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning analysis of oral solid dosage formulation solubility variations by adjusting pressure and temperature.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing computational evaluation of adsorption via porous materials by artificial intelligence and computational fluid dynamics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we utilized a comprehensive dataset comprising over 19,000 data points with inputs represented by coordinates (x, y) and the corresponding output denoted as concentration (C). The case study was analysis of mesoporous material for adsorption separation of target solute from aqueous solution. Mass transfer and machine learning evaluations were carried out to obtain separation efficiency. Our objective was to develop predictive models for C using three distinct base models: decision tree (DT), support vector regression (SVR), and Gaussian process regression (GPR). To enhance the predictive performance of these base models, we employed the ensemble method AdaBoost, which combines their outputs to yield more accurate predictions. Hyper-parameter optimization was achieved through particle swarm optimization, allowing us to fine-tune the models for optimal results. The results of our experiments demonstrate promising performance across the ensemble models. Specifically, AdaBoost combined with decision tree (ADA-DT) yielded an impressive R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.