Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461663›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Nipple Segmentation in Digital Mammography.

Marcos Rogozinski, Jan Hurtado, Cesar A Sierra-Franco, Carlos R Hall Barbosa, Alberto Raposo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcos RogozinskiDepartment of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. mrogozinski@inf.puc-rio.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6353-0338
Jan HurtadoDepartment of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cesar A Sierra-FrancoDepartment of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Carlos R Hall BarbosaPostgraduate Programme in Metrology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Alberto RaposoDepartment of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a novel methodology to enhance nipple segmentation in digital mammography, a critical component for accurate medical analysis and computer-aided detection systems. The nipple is a key anatomical landmark for multi-view and multi-modality breast image registration, where accurate localization is vital for ensuring image quality and enabling precise registration of anomalies across different mammographic views. The proposed approach significantly outperforms baseline methods, particularly in challenging cases where previous techniques failed. It achieved successful detection across all cases and reached a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 0.63 in instances where the baseline failed entirely. Additionally, it yielded nearly a tenfold improvement in Hausdorff distance and consistent gains in overlap-based metrics, with the mIoU increasing from 0.7408 to 0.8011 in the craniocaudal (CC) view and from 0.7488 to 0.7767 in the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. Furthermore, its generalizability suggests the potential for application to other breast imaging modalities and related domains facing challenges such as class imbalance and high variability in object characteristics.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyNipplesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansDeep learningEnsemble learningImage segmentationMammography imageObject detection

Identifiers

PMID40461663
PMCPMC13103037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.