ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Nipple Segmentation in Digital Mammography.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reducing false positives in breast cancer screening with computer-aided detection.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a novel methodology to enhance nipple segmentation in digital mammography, a critical component for accurate medical analysis and computer-aided detection systems. The nipple is a key anatomical landmark for multi-view and multi-modality breast image registration, where accurate localization is vital for ensuring image quality and enabling precise registration of anomalies across different mammographic views. The proposed approach significantly outperforms baseline methods, particularly in challenging cases where previous techniques failed. It achieved successful detection across all cases and reached a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 0.63 in instances where the baseline failed entirely. Additionally, it yielded nearly a tenfold improvement in Hausdorff distance and consistent gains in overlap-based metrics, with the mIoU increasing from 0.7408 to 0.8011 in the craniocaudal (CC) view and from 0.7488 to 0.7767 in the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. Furthermore, its generalizability suggests the potential for application to other breast imaging modalities and related domains facing challenges such as class imbalance and high variability in object characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.