ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying modifiable factors and their causal effects on osteoporosis risk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacological effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Osteoporosis in primary biliary cholangitis: from cholestasis to fracture prevention.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is the most common disease affecting bone health, and previous studies have identified many risk factors for it. However, the diversity and co-occurrence of risk factors were underestimated in those hypothesis-driven studies. Here we collected data of 491,344 participants from the UK Biobank with more than 17 years of follow-up data for 642 modifiable risk factors. First, we performed an exposure wide association study to identify the factors associated with osteoporosis and generated a composite score for each domain. Then multivariate Cox regression was applied to evaluate the joint effects of risk factors. Finally, Mendelian randomization was used to verify the causal effects. The results showed that osteoporosis is associated with exposure factors from many domains. The results of Mendelian randomization study suggested that irritable bowel syndrome (OR 2.869(1.412-5.831), P = 0.0036), standing height (OR 1.163(1.012-1.337), P = 0.0331) and trunk fat-free mass (OR 1.247(1.017-1.530), P = 0.0341) were potential causal risk factors for osteoporosis, and body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.801(0.675-0.949), P = 0.0103) was associated with reduced risk. Joint analysis suggested that favorable physical measures, health and medical history and lifestyle status could significantly reduce the risk of osteoporosis, especially in men. This study provided a valuable reference for osteoporosis prevention and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.