ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-based electrical impedance spectroscopy analysis for malignant and potentially malignant oral disorder detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-guided bioelectrical impedance mapping for rapid adjunctive margin assessment in Mohs surgery.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- Oral cancer in the era of precision medicine: molecular targets and technological innovations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The electrical tumor microenvironment: abnormalities and opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and its application in early oral cancer screening: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Targeted Screening Strategies for Head and Neck Cancer: A Global Review of Evidence, Technologies, and Cost-Effectiveness.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a powerful tool used to investigate the properties of materials and biological tissues. This study presents one of the first applications of EIS for the detection and classification of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and oral cancer. We aimed to apply EIS in conjunction with deep learning to assist the clinical diagnosis of OPMD and oral cancer as a non-invasive diagnostic technology. Currently, the diagnosis of OPMD and oral cancer relies on clinical examination and histopathological analysis of invasive scalpel tissue biopsies, which is stressful for patients, time-consuming for clinicians and subject to histopathological interobserver variation in diagnosis, although recent advances in artificial intelligence may circumvent discrepancy. Here we developed a novel deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method to automatically differentiate normal, OPMD and malignant oral tissues using EIS measurements. EIS readings were initially taken from untreated or glacial acetic acid-treated porcine oral mucosa and analyzed via CNN to determine if this method could discriminate between normal and damaged oral epithelium. CNN models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.92 ± 0.03, with specificity 0.95 and sensitivity 0.84, showing good discrimination. EIS data from ventral tongue and floor-of-the-mouth were collected from 51 healthy humans and 11 patients with OPMD and oral cancer. When a binary classification (low or high risk of malignancy) was applied, the best CNN model achieved an AUC 0.91 ± 0.1, with accuracy 0.91 ± 0.05, specificity 0.97 and sensitivity 0.74. These results demonstrate the considerable potential of EIS in combination with CNN models as an adjunctive non-invasive diagnostic tool for OPMD and oral cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.