Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461631›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning-based electrical impedance spectroscopy analysis for malignant and potentially malignant oral disorder detection.

Zhicheng Lin, Zi-Qiang Lang, Lingzhong Guo, Dawn C Walker, Malwina Matella, Mengxiao Wang, Craig Murdoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhicheng LinSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Zi-Qiang LangSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. z.lang@sheffield.ac.uk.
Lingzhong GuoSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Dawn C WalkerInsigneo, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Malwina MatellaInsigneo, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mengxiao WangSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Craig MurdochInsigneo, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R018480/1Yorkshire Cancer Research YCRSPF/2023/172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a powerful tool used to investigate the properties of materials and biological tissues. This study presents one of the first applications of EIS for the detection and classification of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and oral cancer. We aimed to apply EIS in conjunction with deep learning to assist the clinical diagnosis of OPMD and oral cancer as a non-invasive diagnostic technology. Currently, the diagnosis of OPMD and oral cancer relies on clinical examination and histopathological analysis of invasive scalpel tissue biopsies, which is stressful for patients, time-consuming for clinicians and subject to histopathological interobserver variation in diagnosis, although recent advances in artificial intelligence may circumvent discrepancy. Here we developed a novel deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method to automatically differentiate normal, OPMD and malignant oral tissues using EIS measurements. EIS readings were initially taken from untreated or glacial acetic acid-treated porcine oral mucosa and analyzed via CNN to determine if this method could discriminate between normal and damaged oral epithelium. CNN models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.92 ± 0.03, with specificity 0.95 and sensitivity 0.84, showing good discrimination. EIS data from ventral tongue and floor-of-the-mouth were collected from 51 healthy humans and 11 patients with OPMD and oral cancer. When a binary classification (low or high risk of malignancy) was applied, the best CNN model achieved an AUC 0.91 ± 0.1, with accuracy 0.91 ± 0.05, specificity 0.97 and sensitivity 0.74. These results demonstrate the considerable potential of EIS in combination with CNN models as an adjunctive non-invasive diagnostic tool for OPMD and oral cancer.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDielectric SpectroscopyMouth NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansMouth MucosaNeural Networks, ComputerSwineDeep learningDysplasiaElectrical impedance spectroscopyOral cancerPotentially malignant lesions

Identifiers

PMID40461631
PMCPMC12134277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.