Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461599›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel EEG artifact removal algorithm based on an advanced attention mechanism.

Rui Jiang, Shen Tong, Jiawei Wu, Haowei Hu, Ran Zhang, Heng Wang, Yan Zhao, Weixin Zhu, Shuyan Li, Xiao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rui Jiang *School of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Shen Tong *School of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Jiawei WuSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Haowei HuSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Ran ZhangSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Heng WangSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Yan ZhaoXuzhou Jiazhi information Technology Co., Ltd., Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Weixin ZhuJinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua, 321000, China.
Shuyan LiSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, China. lishuyan@xzhmu.edu.cn.
Xiao ZhangSchool of Medicine and Health, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China. changshui@hotmail.com.

Funding

the Jinhua Major Key Science and Technology Plan Project 2023-3-093The National Key Research and Development Project 2000YFC2006601The Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Talents of Xuzhou Medical University D2019032The Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Talents of Xuzhou Medical University D2023031The Unveiling & Leading Project of XZHMU JBGS202204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EEG is widely applied in emotion recognition, brain disease detection, and other fields due to its high temporal resolution and non-invasiveness. However, artifact removal remains a crucial issue in EEG signal processing. Recently, with the rapid development of deep learning, there has been a significant transformation in the methods of EEG artifact removal. Nonetheless, existing research still exhibits some limitations: (1) insufficient capability to remove unknown artifacts; (2) inability to adapt to tasks where artifact removal needs to be applied to the overall input of multi-channel EEG data. Therefore, this study proposes CLEnet by integrating dual-scale CNN (Convolutional Neural Networks) and LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory), and incorporating an improved EMA-1D (One-Dimensional Efficient Multi-Scale Attention Mechanism). CLEnet can extract the morphological features and temporal features of EEG, thereby separating EEG from artifacts. We conducted experiments on three datasets, and the results showed that CLEnet performed best. Specifically, in the task of removing artifacts from multi-channel EEG data containing unknown artifacts, CLEnet shows improvements of 2.45% and 2.65% in SNR(signal-to-noise ratio) and CC(average correlation coefficient). Moreover, RRMSE

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsAttentionElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSignal-To-Noise RatioArtifact removalAttention mechanismDeep learningElectroencephalogram (EEG)

Identifiers

PMID40461599
PMCPMC12134218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.