ReviewCommunications engineering2025
Data-intelligence driven methods for durability, damage diagnosis and performance prediction of concrete structures.
Review in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solar radiation prediction using multivariate signal decomposition and physics-informed time-frequency feature extraction.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Thermally Insulated Drilling Pipes: Materials, Design Strategies, and Future Directions.Polymers · 2026Review
- Feasibility of Full-Range Replacement of Natural Coarse Aggregates with Recycled Foam Concrete Aggregate: Effects on Rheology, Mechanical Degradation, and Shear Resistance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temperature sensitivity analysis and service performance evaluation of aqueduct arch ring beam structures based on finite element method.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A large number of in-service reinforced concrete structures are now entering the mid-to-late stages of their service life. Efficient detection of damage characteristics and accurate prediction of material performance degradation have become essential for ensuring the safety of these structures. Traditional damage detection methods, which primarily rely on manual inspections and sensor monitoring, are inefficient and lack accuracy. Similarly, performance prediction models for reinforced concrete materials, which are often based on limited experimental data and polynomial fitting, oversimplify the influencing factors. In contrast, partial differential equation models that account for degradation mechanisms are computationally intensive and difficult to solve. Recent advancements in deep learning and machine learning, as part of artificial intelligence, have introduced innovative approaches for both damage detection and material performance prediction in reinforced concrete structures. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of machine learning and deep learning theories and models, and reviews the current research on their application to the durability of reinforced concrete structures, focusing on two main areas: intelligent damage detection and predictive modeling of material durability. Finally, the article discusses future trends and offers insights into the intelligent innovation of concrete structure durability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.