Observational studyScientific reports2025
Comparison of triglyceride-glucose related indices in prediction of cardiometabolic disease incidence among US midlife women.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anthropometry-adjusted TyG indices predict diabetes, graft failure, and mortality in kidney transplant recipients.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Optimizing early triage for subclinical cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: longitudinal associations, incremental value, and clinical utility of nine insulin resistance surrogates.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Association of the TyG index and its body fat distribution composites with CHD and MACE risk in adults with OSAHS: incremental discrimination and exploratory mediation analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Triglyceride-glucose index and its derivatives as emerging biomarkers of insulin resistance for prognostic evaluation of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: mechanisms and clinical applications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Assessment of cholesterol-HDL-glucose index in anticipating risk of cardiometabolic diseases: a comparative study with triglyceride-glucose index.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of triglyceride-glucose (TyG) related indices on cardiometabolic disease (CMD) are still unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between the TyG-related indices and CMD risk among midlife women. This retrospective observational cohort study utilized data from the 2020 SWAN participants. The TyG index was computed as Ln [fasting triglyceride (mg/dL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/2]. Modified TyG indices were created by integrating TyG with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to assess the associations and predictive capacities of TyG and its related indices with CMD incidences. The mean age of participants was 45.7 years, comprising 420 (20.8%) Black, 184 (9.1%) Chinese, 225 (11.1%) Japanese, and 1191 (58.9%) Caucasian or Hispanic women. Over a 10-year follow-up, 837 women (41.4%) developed CMD. Compared to the lowest quartile, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for incident CMD in the highest quartile for TyG, TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, and TyG-WHtR were 1.78 (1.41-2.25), 3.26 (2.51-4.24), 3.13 (2.41-4.06), and 3.19 (2.47-4.12), respectively. The area under the ROC curve for modified TyG indices was significantly higher than that for the TyG index alone. Both the TyG and modified TyG indices were significantly associated with new-onset CMD, with modified TyG indices showing superior performance in identifying individuals at risk for CMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.