ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal deep learning for chemical toxicity prediction and management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven fungicide design: From target identification to field application.Plant communications · 2026Review
- Constraint aware and uncertainty informed QSAR modeling of Tetrahymena pyriformis toxicity using physicochemical descriptors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-task deep learning models for mechanism-based prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) using ToxCast bioassays.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence in antibody-drug conjugate development: from target identification to clinical translation in oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate prediction of chemical toxicity is a crucial research focus in chemistry, biotechnology, and national defense. The development of comprehensive datasets for chemical toxicity prediction remains limited due to security constraints and the structural complexity of chemical data. Existing studies are often confined to specific domains, such as genotoxicity or acute oral toxicity. To address these gaps, this study introduces an integrated research dataset that combines chemical property data and molecular structure images. The dataset is curated from diverse sources, preprocessed, and normalized to optimize it for deep learning applications. The proposed deep learning model enhances the precision of multi-toxicity predictions by integrating Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture for image-based data and a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) for numerical data. A joint fusion mechanism is employed to effectively combine image and numerical features, significantly improving predictive performance. The model is also designed for multi-label toxicity prediction, enabling simultaneous evaluation of diverse toxicological endpoints. Experimental results show that ViT model demonstrate an accuracy of 0.872, an F1-score of 0.86, and a Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) of 0.9192.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.