ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of phenolics and tannins from pomegranate peel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Drug Discovery From Medicinal Plants: Current Applications and Infrastructural Challenges.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- CrayStack: a simplified crayfish optimization driven stacking ensemble for prediction of machining quality characteristics under data scarcity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ultrasound and microwave assisted extraction of bioactives from food wastes: An overview on their comparative analysis towards commercialization.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Review
- Physicochemical Characterization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dietary polyphenols and human health: sources, biological activities, nutritional and immunological aspects, and bioavailability- a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The peel of pomegranate (Punica granatum) is rich in bioactive compounds, specifically phenolic compounds and tannin compounds. However, there is still a lot of difficulty dealing with the extraction of these substances due to the limitations of traditional methods. Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) has shown promise, but optimizing it for maximum efficiency and yield remains a challenge. In this work, a microwave-assisted extraction improved using machine learning approaches was used to extract tannins and phenolic compounds from pomegranate peel. The experimental design consisted of four independent variables: microwave power (100-300 W), extraction time (10-40 min), temperature (35-50 °C), and food-to-solvent ratio (0.25-0.5 g/10 mL). The evaluated response variables were total phenolic (mg GAE/g), total tannin (mg CE/g), and antioxidant activity (DPPH scavenging activity). Thirty experiments were conducted using the microwave extraction system. Two machine learning models, LSBoost with Random Forest (LSBoost/RF) and LSBoost with K-Nearest Neighbors Neural Network (LSBoost/KNN-NN), were developed and compared for predicting extraction outcomes. The LSBoost/RF model demonstrated superior performance, achieving correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.9998, 0.9018, and 0.9269 for total phenolic, total tannin, and DPPH %, respectively. Feature importance analysis revealed microwave power as the most influential parameter, particularly for tannin content and antioxidant potency. The findings indicate that the combination of microwave-assisted extraction with machine learning provides an effective and accurate approach for the extraction and prediction of phenolic and tannin compounds in natural sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.