Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461575›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Determinants of regenerative endodontic therapy use among pediatric and endodontic specialists in 13 countries.

Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu, Ömer Hatipoğlu, Nessrin Taha, Anna Paulina Lehmann, Thiyezen Abdullah Aldhelai, Ahmed A Madfa, Afaf Y Al-Haddad, Silvana Jukić Krmek, Muhammad Qasim Javed, Usman Anwer Bhatti and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fatma Pertek HatipoğluDepartment of Endodontics, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
Ömer HatipoğluDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey. omerhtp@gmail.com.
Nessrin TahaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Anna Paulina LehmannDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Thiyezen Abdullah AldhelaiDepartment of Orthodontic and Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraydah, 52571, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed A MadfaDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Afaf Y Al-HaddadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Silvana Jukić KrmekDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Muhammad Qasim JavedDepartment of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraydah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Usman Anwer BhattiDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Milan DrobacDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Sugumaran SurendarSaveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
João Filipe Brochado MartinsDepartment of Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paulo J PalmaCenter for Innovation and Research in Oral Sciences (CIROS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the adoption and application of regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) among endodontists and pediatric dentists across multiple countries, focusing on demographic, professional, and geographic variability.A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1394 participants from 13 countries. The survey included demographic information, motivational and demotivational factors, and seven clinical scenarios to assess RET application. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for RET adoption using univariate logistic regression. Meta-analysis was performed to account for heterogeneity.The findings revealed significant variability in RET practices. Immature teeth with apical periodontitis and necrotic pulp had the highest odds of RET application (OR = 21.25, 95% CI 16.43-27.49), while mature teeth with necrotic pulp showed significantly lower odds (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.09-0.14). Barriers to RET included insufficient training (25.8%), patient disapproval (17.1%), and concerns over unconvincing results (15.9%). Endodontists were more likely to perform RET than pediatric dentists (OR = 2.11 vs. OR = 1.33), and younger practitioners demonstrated higher adoption rates. Countries like Turkey and Yemen exhibited the highest RET application rates, whereas Serbia and Poland reported minimal adoption.Despite the well-documented biological advantages of RET, its broader adoption is hindered by gaps in training, knowledge, and systemic support. Addressing these barriers through targeted educational initiatives and policy integration can enhance the global implementation of RET, optimizing patient outcomes and advancing endodontic practice.

Indexed as

EndodonticsEndodontistsPractice Patterns, Dentists'Regenerative EndodonticsRoot Canal TherapyAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40461575
PMCPMC12134059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.