ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative study of internal fixation with porous tantalum screws and cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advantages of TiRobot-assisted technology in internal fixation of femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of surgical parameters and complications.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Expert Consensus on Vascular Assessment and Treatment Strategies for Adult Femoral Neck Fractures.Annals of plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are a significant concern, particularly in elderly patients with osteoporosis and younger individuals experiencing high-energy traumas. Traditional treatments, like cannulated compression screws (CCSs), often result in complications such as avascular necrosis (AVN). This study evaluated the effectiveness of bidirectional compression porous tantalum screws (BCPTSs) against conventional CCSs in FNF treatment. A retrospective study was conducted on 109 patients with FNF treated at Zhongshan Hospital, Dalian University, from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the fixation method: two CCSs, three CCSs, and BCPTSs. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using anteroposterior radiographs, with follow-up evaluations at six weeks, three months, 12 months, and 24 months. Diabetic patients were also included as subjects of observation to analyze the association between postoperative osteonecrosis and diabetes. In the two CCSs group, seven patients (7/20, 35%) experienced AVN, compared to 17 patients (17/39, 43.58%) in the three CCSs group. In contrast, only one patient (1/50, 2%) in the BCPTSs group developed nonunion, with no cases of AVN. In a comparison among diabetic patients, there was one case of postoperative AVN in the two CCSs group, five cases in three CCSs group, and one case of fracture nonunion in the BCPTSs group. BCPTSs offer a superior alternative to conventional CCSs in treating FNF, particularly in reducing AVN and nonunion rates. The study highlights the importance of vascular preservation and contributes a new option for treating FNF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.