Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461562›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deciphering the dynamics of enzymes associated with the synthesis of cryoprotectants during cold acclimation in contrasting chickpea genotypes.

Deeksha Padhiar, Sarbjeet Kaur, Anju Rani, Uday Chand Jha, P V Vara Prasad, Kamal Dev Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar, Swarup Kumar Parida, Kadambot H M Siddique, Harsh Nayyar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deeksha PadhiarDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Sarbjeet KaurDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Anju RaniDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Uday Chand JhaCrop Improvement Division, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, 208024, India. u9811981@gmail.com.
P V Vara PrasadDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Kansas, 66506, USA. vara@ksu.edu.
Kamal Dev SharmaDepartment of Agriculture Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, 176062, India.
Sanjeev KumarDepartment of Plant Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bhatinda, India.
Swarup Kumar ParidaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia. siddique@uwa.edu.au.
Harsh NayyarDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India. harshnayyar.hn@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea, a vital legume crop, is highly susceptible to cold stress, especially during its reproductive phase, resulting in significant flower and pod abortions and reduced seed yield. Our previous study demonstrated that cold acclimation is effective in enhancing cold tolerance but benefits only cold-tolerant (CT) genotypes, while cold-sensitive (CS) genotypes remain unaffected. In this extended study aimed at probing the detailed mechanisms of this differential response, we further examined the expression profiles of enzymes involved in the synthesis and breakdown of osmolytes (pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase, proline dehydrogenase (PDH), betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase) and sugars (sucrose synthase, acid invertase, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase, trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase, and trehalase activity), along with the expression of various antioxidants (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase) in both CT and CS genotypes. Seeds of two contrasting chickpea genotypes, cold-tolerant ICC 17258 and cold-sensitive ICC 15567, were planted in pots during the first week of November in an outdoor field environment. After 40 days, the plants were transferred to walk-in growth chambers for cold acclimation at specific temperatures. Initially, the plants were exposed the plants to 25/18℃ (pre-acclimation stage; PAS) for 2 days, followed by a 21-day cold acclimation period with progressively decreasing temperatures over seven days for each cold acclimation stage (CAS): CAS1 (21/13℃), CAS2 (18/10℃), and CAS3 (15/8℃). Subsequently, the plants were subjected to cold stress at 13/7℃ for 15 days and then exposed to 30/23℃ (12 h day/night) until maturity. Our findings demonstrated that the expression of various enzymes involved in the synthesis of osmolytes and sugars in leaves, anthers, and ovules was significantly upregulated during the cold acclimation process in the CT chickpea genotypes but not in the CS genotypes. This enhanced metabolic activity, coupled with elevated levels of enzymatic antioxidants during the acclimation process, contributed to improved leaf water status, photosynthetic efficiency, and ultimately, superior reproductive performance (pollen germination, pollen viability, stigma receptivity, and ovule viability) under cold stress conditions compared to CS genotypes. The enhanced cold tolerance observed in the CT genotypes is likely attributable to their genetic predisposition and efficient stress defense mechanisms facilitated by the upregulated expression of cold-responsive enzymes.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationCicerCryoprotective AgentsPlant ProteinsAntioxidantsCold-Shock ResponseCold TemperatureGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypeSeedsAntioxidantsCryoprotective AgentsPlant ProteinsAntioxidant metabolismChickpeaChilling; stressOsmolytesProlineSugar dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40461562
PMCPMC12134180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.