Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461545›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Use of deep learning-based NLP models for full-text data elements extraction for systematic literature review tasks.

Jingcheng Du, Dong Wang, Bin Lin, Long He, Liang-Chin Huang, Jingqi Wang, Frank J Manion, Yeran Li, Nicole Cossrow, Lixia Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jingcheng DuIntelligent Medical Objects, Houston, TX, USA.
Dong WangMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. dong.wang10@merck.com.
Bin LinIntelligent Medical Objects, Houston, TX, USA.
Long HeIntelligent Medical Objects, Houston, TX, USA.
Liang-Chin HuangIntelligent Medical Objects, Houston, TX, USA.
Jingqi WangIntelligent Medical Objects, Houston, TX, USA.
Frank J ManionIntelligent Medical Objects, Houston, TX, USA.
Yeran LiMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Nicole CossrowMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Lixia YaoMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic literature review (SLR) is an important tool for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) evidence synthesis. SLRs involve the identification and selection of pertinent publications and extraction of relevant data elements from full-text articles, which can be a manually intensive procedure. Previously we developed machine learning models to automatically identify relevant publications based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study investigates the feasibility of applying Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches to automatically extract data elements from the relevant scientific literature. First, 239 full-text articles were collected and annotated for 12 important variables including study cohort, lab technique, and disease type, for proper SLR summary of Human papillomavirus (HPV) Prevalence, Pneumococcal Epidemiology, and Pneumococcal Economic Burden. The three resulting annotated corpora are shared publicly at [ https://github.com/Merck/NLP-SLR-corpora ], to provide training data and a benchmark baseline for the NLP community to further research this challenging task. We then compared three classic Named Entity Recognition (NER) algorithms, namely Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models, to assess performance on the data element extraction task. The annotation corpora contain 4,498, 579, and 252 annotated entity mentions for HPV Prevalence, Pneumococcal Epidemiology, and Pneumococcal Economic Burden tasks respectively. Deep learning algorithms achieved superior performance in recognizing the targeted SLR data elements, compared to conventional machine learning algorithms. LSTM models have achieved 0.890, 0.646 and 0.615 micro-averaged F1 scores for three tasks respectively. CRF models could not provide comparable performance on most of the elements of interest. Although BERT-based models are known to generally achieve superior performance on many NLP tasks, we did not observe improvement in our three tasks. Deep learning algorithms have achieved superior performance compared with machine learning models on multiple SLR data element extraction tasks. LSTM model, in particular, is more preferable for deployment in supporting HEOR SLR data element extraction, due to its better performance, generalizability, and scalability as it's cost-effective in our SLR benchmark datasets.

Indexed as

Data MiningDeep LearningNatural Language ProcessingSystematic Reviews as TopicAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40461545
PMCPMC12134170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.