Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461534›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Forage maize type influences on methane emissions, nutrient degradation, and fermentation profiles in ruminants.

Farhad Parnian-Khajehdizaj, Sajjad Moharramnejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Farhad Parnian-KhajehdizajAnimal Science Research Department, East Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Tabriz, Iran. f.parnian@areeo.ac.ir.
Sajjad MoharramnejadCrop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Moghan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of forage maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars significantly impacts ruminant nutrition and environmental sustainability. This study evaluated four maize types (TWC647, SC704, D5, and a SC704 + D5 mixture) for their effects on methane emissions, nutrient degradability, and rumen fermentation using in vitro techniques. SC704 exhibited the highest gas production (236.8 ml/g DM), metabolizable energy (5.17 MJ/kg DM), and net energy for lactation (2.64 MJ/kg DM). TWC647 showed the highest degradability of dry matter, crude protein, and NDF. The SC704 + D5 mixture enhanced volatile fatty acid production but also resulted in the highest methane emissions (71.5 l/kg FOM). These findings emphasize the importance of cultivar selection in optimizing fermentation efficiency and reducing environmental impact.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFermentationMethaneNutrientsRuminantsZea maysAnimalsFatty Acids, VolatileRumenFatty Acids, VolatileMethaneNutrientsForage maize typeIn vitro gas productionMethane emissionsNutrient degradabilityRumen fermentation

Identifiers

PMID40461534
PMCPMC12134287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.