Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for kinesiophobia in postoperative lung cancer patients: an interpretable machine learning algorithm study.

Chuang Li, Youbei Lin, Xuyang Xiao, Xinru Guo, Jinrui Fei, Yanyan Lu, Junling Zhao, Lan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chuang LiDepartment of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Youbei LinSchool of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Xuyang XiaoThoracic Surgery Unit, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Xinru GuoSchool of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Jinrui FeiSchool of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Yanyan LuThoracic Surgery Unit, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Junling ZhaoThoracic Surgery Unit, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Lan ZhangDepartment of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China. zhang800519@126.com.

Funding

2024 Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Joint Program 2024-MSLH-168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinesiophobia is particularly common in postoperative lung cancer patients, which causes patients may be reluctant to cough and move due to misperception, internal fear or fear of pain, and avoid rehabilitation training affecting postoperative recovery. Therefore, it is clinically important to discover the factors associated with the occurrence of kinesiophobia and to develop a prediction model. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of kinesiophobia in postoperative lung cancer patients and to develop a prediction model to assess its performance, thereby providing a reference for clinical decision-making. A cross-sectional study involving 519 postoperative lung cancer patients from a tertiary hospital in Liaoning Province was conducted. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multifactor logistic regression were used to screen predictors. Subsequently, six machine learning (ML) models were developed and compared to identify the optimal model. The importance of feature variables was ranked and interpreted to facilitate risk assessment. The incidence of kinesiophobia among postoperative lung cancer patients was 43.74%. Positive coping style, social support, pain severity, personal income, surgical history, and gender were identified as significant predictors of kinesiophobia. Among the evaluated models, the RF model demonstrated the best performance, with an AUROC of 0.893, accuracy of 0.803, precision of 0.732, recall of 0.870, and F1 score of 0.795. The calibration curve of the RF model closely aligned with the ideal 45-degree diagonal, indicating strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Furthermore, DCA revealed that the RF model provided the highest net benefit in predicting postoperative agoraphobia in lung cancer patients. This study demonstrates that machine learning models-particularly the RF algorithm-hold substantial promise for predicting kinesiophobia in postoperative lung cancer patients. By integrating individual background characteristics along with physical, psychological, and social factors, the RF model effectively identifies high-risk patients and provides a valuable foundation for early clinical screening and intervention. These findings underscore the critical influence of multidimensional factors in the development of postoperative kinesiophobia and highlight the advantages of machine learning in enhancing predictive accuracy and supporting personalized medical decision-making. To improve the model's generalizability and clinical utility, future research should incorporate heterogeneous datasets from multiple regions and healthcare institutions to ensure broader applicability and greater robustness.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMachine LearningPhobic DisordersAdultAgedAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKinesiophobiaMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsKinesiophobiaMachine learningPositive coping stylePostoperative lung cancerPostoperative rehabilitationRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40461518
PMCPMC12134359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.