ArticleScientific reports2025
Tailored role specific training program improves knowledge attitudes and practices in medical waste management among dental professionals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective management of medical waste management (MWM) in dental clinics is essential for occupational safety and environmental sustainability, yet standardized training programs tailored to professional roles remain understudied. This quasi-experimental pre-post study evaluated a novel role-specific training intervention's impact on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among 187 dental professionals (80 dentists, 60 nurses, 47 dental students) at a dental hospital. Participants underwent training aligned with WHO guidelines and China's Medical Waste Management Regulations (Order No. 380), with KAP assessed via validated questionnaires (Cronbach's α = 0.85) pre- and post-training. Baseline knowledge varied significantly by role (dentists: 65.2% vs. students: 52.0%, p < 0.01). Post-training analyses revealed substantial improvements: knowledge scores increased from 60.2 to 91.2% (Δ + 30.7%, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.81), attitudes improved by 17.3 points (d = 1.66), and practices by 22.0 points (d = 1.84). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated significant time × group interactions for knowledge (F(2,184) = 4.9, p = 0.03, η
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.