Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461492›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Measurement of spatial heterogeneity in street restorative perceptions and street refinement design.

Yalun Lei, Qingqing Li, Jingwen Tian, Jia Hu, Jixiang Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yalun LeiCollege of Fashion and Design, Donghua University, Shanghai, 200051, China.
Qingqing LiCollege of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Jingwen TianCollege of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Jia HuCollege of Art and Creativity, Anhui Vocational and Technical College, Hefei, 230011, China. jiah9177@yeah.net.
Jixiang JiangCollege of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M742669The 2023 Key Projects for University Scientific Research in Anhui Province (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2023AH051408the 2024 General Project of MOE(Ministry of Education) Foundation for Humanities and Social Science Project 24YJC760056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restorative perception of streets is an essential metric for evaluating urban environments and serves as a key indicator of pedestrians' perspectives on street refinement design. However, restorative perception varies significantly across different streets, necessitating an analysis of these disparities. This study integrates street view data, deep learning algorithms, the MGWR model, and space syntax to analyze spatial heterogeneity in restorative perceptions and optimize street design strategies. Using the random forest (RF) algorithm and restorative component scales (RCS), we assessed residents' perceptions of street restoration in Shanghai's Huangpu District. Our analysis identified eight key visual elements influencing perceptions, such as sidewalks, buildings, and walls. Results revealed significant geographic variations, with high-perception areas concentrated around open parks, waterfronts, and well-designed buildings featuring thoughtful amenities. Visual elements like trees and plants were found to significantly enhance restorative perceptions. Moran's Ι statistics and multiple regression models further revealed spatial heterogeneity and clustering in perceptions, highlighting the importance of location-based planning. Among the regression models, the MGWR model achieved the highest R

Indexed as

City PlanningEnvironment DesignPedestriansPerceptionAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleSpatial AnalysisDeep learning algorithmMGWR modelRefinement designRestorative environment perceptionSpatial heterogeneityStreet view images

Identifiers

PMID40461492
PMCPMC12134117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.