ArticleScientific reports2025
Measurement of spatial heterogeneity in street restorative perceptions and street refinement design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring the psychological restorative quality of urban spaces: a vision language model-based method.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restorative perception of streets is an essential metric for evaluating urban environments and serves as a key indicator of pedestrians' perspectives on street refinement design. However, restorative perception varies significantly across different streets, necessitating an analysis of these disparities. This study integrates street view data, deep learning algorithms, the MGWR model, and space syntax to analyze spatial heterogeneity in restorative perceptions and optimize street design strategies. Using the random forest (RF) algorithm and restorative component scales (RCS), we assessed residents' perceptions of street restoration in Shanghai's Huangpu District. Our analysis identified eight key visual elements influencing perceptions, such as sidewalks, buildings, and walls. Results revealed significant geographic variations, with high-perception areas concentrated around open parks, waterfronts, and well-designed buildings featuring thoughtful amenities. Visual elements like trees and plants were found to significantly enhance restorative perceptions. Moran's Ι statistics and multiple regression models further revealed spatial heterogeneity and clustering in perceptions, highlighting the importance of location-based planning. Among the regression models, the MGWR model achieved the highest R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.