Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461475›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

De novo design of protein condensation inhibitors by targeting an allosteric site of cGAS.

Wenfeng Zhao, Guofeng Chen, Jian He, Xiaofang Shen, Muya Xiong, Liwei Xiong, Zhihao Qi, Hang Xie, Wanchen Li, Jiameng Li and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic targeting of the cGAS-STING pathway in human disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Drugs against broad-spectrum of coronaviruses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Wenfeng Zhao *State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. zhaowenfeng@simm.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2517-4747
Guofeng Chen *School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Jian He *State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaofang Shen *State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Muya Xiong *School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-5303
Liwei XiongState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Zhihao QiState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Hang XieState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Wanchen LiState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jiameng LiState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Huixia DouState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Hangchen HuState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Haixia SuState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Qiang ShaoState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-3095
Minjun LiShanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Hongbin SunJiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Disease, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Yechun XuState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. ycxu@simm.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1581-6155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), a key mediator of the cGAS-STING DNA sensing pathway that triggers type-I interferon responses, plays a crucial role in innate immunity and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various disease. Despite advances in the development of cGAS inhibitors, none have reached the market and there remains an unmet need for divergent chemical scaffolds with high selectivity, potency across species, and target-adaptive mechanisms of action to explore cGAS's potential as a therapeutic target. Here we report the structural, biochemical, cellular, and mechanistic characterization of the XL series of allosteric inhibitors, designed to engage an innovative allosteric site near the activation loop of cGAS. Among them, XL-3156 and XL-3158 emerge as potent, selective, cross-species cGAS inhibitors that simultaneously occupy allosteric and orthosteric sites, stabilizing the activation loop in a closed, inactive conformation and thereby attenuating the cGAS-DNA interactions. Moreover, these allosteric inhibitors, also known as protein condensation inhibitors (PCIs), significantly suppress cGAS-DNA condensate formation, triggering a morphological transition from liquid-solid phase separation (LSPS) to liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) at the molecular level while eliminating LLPS in cells. The distinct mechanism of action enables PCIs to achieve synergistic effects in combination with orthosteric inhibitors. These results establish a mechanism-driven pharmacological strategy to inhibit cGAS through PCIs that modulate phase separation primarily by engagement of the allosteric site.

Indexed as

Enzyme InhibitorsNucleotidyltransferasesAllosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDNADrug DesignHEK293 CellsHumanscGAS protein, humanCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDNAEnzyme InhibitorsNucleotidyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID40461475
PMCPMC12134298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.