Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461407›Full record

ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

Missing the Target: A Scoping Review of the Use of Percent Weight Loss for Obesity Management.

Diana Sherifali, Megan Racey, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Michelle Greenway, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Jun Wada, Soo Huat Teoh, Ian Patton, David Macklin, Elizabeth F C van Rossum and 11 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Achieving BMI <25 kg/mEClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Missing the Target: A Scoping Review of the Use of Percent Weight Loss for Obesity Management.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Diana SherifaliMcMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Megan RaceyMcMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4636-0397
Donna Fitzpatrick-LewisMcMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle GreenwayMcMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-0601-7552
Sanjeev SockalingamObesity Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-1509
Jun WadaDepartment of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Soo Huat TeohDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, Malaysia.
Ian PattonObesity Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
David MacklinTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth F C van RossumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Obesity Center CGG, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5134-5453
Luca BusettoDepartment of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Deborah Bade HornCenter of Obesity Medicine and Metabolic Performance, Department of Surgery, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
J D Patricia NeceObesity Action Coalition, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Morgan Emile Gabriel Salmon LeguedeABHispalis Spain, Alianza Hispana de Personas con Obesidad Latin America, Seville, Spain.
Nicole PearceObesity Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Carel Le RouxSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jamy ArdSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Angela S AlbergaDepartment of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Lee KaplanObesity, Metabolism and Nutrition Institute Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Arya M SharmaDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9360-6519
Sean WhartonTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Obesity Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo co-create comprehensive targets for obesity management, we need to understand the genesis and current use of percent weight loss targets in research. The goals of our scoping review are to (1) synthesize the literature on percent weight loss targets for adults with obesity and (2) discuss the percent weight loss targets in context with their health benefits.

methodsWe searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for English language, pharmaceutical, and/or behavioral intervention studies in adults with obesity where the explicit aim of the study was weight reduction defined as a percent of body weight. Reviewers screened citations and extracted data including study characteristics.

resultsFrom 16,164 abstracts, we included 30 citations which were mostly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 17) or quasi-experimental studies (n = 12) published between 1992 and 2024. Most of the studies had target weight loss goals between 3% and 10% of body weight (n = 28), while n = 2 had body weight loss goals of 15% or 30%. The proportion of participants who met the percent weight loss target ranged from 5.9% (nutrition only study) to 85% (pharmaceutical study). The studies reported different reasons for targeting a percentage of weight loss such as disease-specific outcomes, reduced risk of disease, or patient-reported outcomes.

conclusionPercent weight loss targets were based on similar research and were often not feasible nor sustainable for most participants. The design of these interventions and evaluation of obesity management would benefit from more patient-focused parameters which could help to co-design comprehensive targets for research and practice.

Indexed as

ObesityObesity ManagementWeight LossHumansobesity managementpercent body weightscoping reviewtargetweight loss

Identifiers

PMID40461407
PMCPMC12531721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.