Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461265›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2025

Identification of distinct disease activity trajectories in patients with psoriatic arthritis receiving tofacitinib: a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies.

Dafna Gladman, William Tillett, David Gruben, Laura C Coates, Stefanie Hahne, Mikhail Volkov

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01877668 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) Or Adalimumab In Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2014 to 2015Enrolled422ConditionsPsoriatic ArthritisArmsTofacitinib 5 mg BID, Tofacitinib 10 mg BID, Adalimumab, Placebo
NCT01882439 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of Tofacitinib (Cp-690,550) In Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis And An Inadequate Response To At Least One Tnf Inhibitor

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2013 to 2016Enrolled395ConditionsPsoriatic ArthritisArmsTofacitinib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Treatment of Isolated Nail Psoriasis with JAK Inhibitor Tofacitinib: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dafna GladmanDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada dafna.gladman@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9074-0592
William TillettDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7531-4125
David GrubenPfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Laura C CoatesNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4756-663X
Stefanie HahnePfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Mikhail VolkovPfizer BV, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo capture variations in tofacitinib treatment response in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by identifying patient groups with distinct disease activity trajectories.

methodsData were pooled post hoc from two phase 3 studies (OPAL Broaden, OPAL Beyond) in patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (n=225, n=226, respectively). Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) to month 6 was used in group-based trajectory modelling to identify distinct treatment response groups based on disease state (very low/low/moderate/high disease activity (VLDA/LDA/MoDA/HDA, respectively)). Baseline characteristics, PASDAS components to month 6 and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

resultsFive trajectory groups were identified for both tofacitinib doses: groups improved from MoDA→VLDA/LDA (group 1); HDA→VLDA (group 2); HDA→MoDA rapidly (group 3) or gradually (group 4) or remained in HDA (group 5). Groups 4/5 generally had significantly higher baseline PsA clinical domain scores than groups 1‒3, except for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index/Nail Psoriasis Severity Index. Baseline Leeds Enthesitis Index/Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada enthesitis scores and tender joint counts were significantly higher in group 4 vs group 2. PASDAS components generally improved to month 6 in all groups, consistent with modelled trajectories. There were no clear trends in AEs across groups.

conclusionsIn patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib, five distinct trajectory groups were identified with different baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes, but no clear trends in AEs. The tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily models showed comparable trajectories and baseline characteristics. In patients with HDA, enthesitis and tender joint count may impact timing and/or magnitude of response to tofacitinib. Identifying characteristics that impact treatment response may aid personalised treatment algorithm development. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01877668/NCT01882439.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomePiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinestofacitinibAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID40461265
PMCPMC12142151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.