Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40461184›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2025

Predicting death or readmission following heart failure hospitalisation: the VancOuver CoastAL Acute Heart Failure (VOCAL-AHF) registry.

Samaneh Salimian, Nathaniel Mark Hawkins, Nandini Dendukuri, Negareh Mousavi, James Brophy

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samaneh SalimianCentre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Division of Cardiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6054-2720
Nathaniel Mark HawkinsCentre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Division of Cardiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1286-2014
Nandini DendukuriCentre for Health Outcomes Research (CORE), McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Negareh MousaviDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
James BrophyDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada james.brophy@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8049-6875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF) readmission and mortality rates remain high among HF patients. Improved and robust risk prediction models for better monitoring, informed decision-making, targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes are required. We developed and validated a patient-centric model to predict long-term outcomes of death or a repeat HF-hospitalisation using a modern model selection approach.

methodsWe used data from a contemporary registry of patients discharged alive from an HF-hospitalisation between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2019. An integrated and multifaceted selection approach (combining backward selection, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and expert opinion) to Cox-proportional hazard models was used for model development. To account for model uncertainty and improve generalisability, bootstrap-Bayesian Model Averaging was used to derive the final risk model.

resultsThe cohort included 1842 patients with a median follow-up time of 529 days (range 2-1459 days). 790 (43%) patients experienced the outcome, with 68 (8.6%) having the outcome within 30 days. The final risk model included 12 variables, of which 8 were identified as being dominant. The top predictors with >99% probability for model inclusion were increasing age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11/5 years), prior HF-diagnoses (1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.71) and lower discharge haemoglobin (1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15/10 g/L). Other predictors (~>60% model-selection probability) included lower admitting systolic blood pressure, higher loop-diuretic discharge requirements, persistent smoking, an admitting non-sinus rhythm and absence of discharge angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor prescription. The 3-year cross-validated c-statistic was 0.63 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.65).

conclusionsA clinically oriented prognostic model with moderate discrimination, to predict adverse events postdischarge for HF, has been developed and internally validated. This model, leveraging an integrated approach to selection, shows promise in personalising discharge planning. Future external validation is necessary to confirm its applicability and potential impact on clinical practice.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHospitalizationPatient ReadmissionRegistriesAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentHEART FAILUREOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40461184
PMCPMC12142106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.