ArticleOpen heart2025
Predicting death or readmission following heart failure hospitalisation: the VancOuver CoastAL Acute Heart Failure (VOCAL-AHF) registry.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of continuous versus intermittent administration of furosemide in acute heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 RCTs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Illness trajectory in the longer term after hospitalisation for COVID-19: a prospective, multicentre cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) readmission and mortality rates remain high among HF patients. Improved and robust risk prediction models for better monitoring, informed decision-making, targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes are required. We developed and validated a patient-centric model to predict long-term outcomes of death or a repeat HF-hospitalisation using a modern model selection approach.
methodsWe used data from a contemporary registry of patients discharged alive from an HF-hospitalisation between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2019. An integrated and multifaceted selection approach (combining backward selection, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and expert opinion) to Cox-proportional hazard models was used for model development. To account for model uncertainty and improve generalisability, bootstrap-Bayesian Model Averaging was used to derive the final risk model.
resultsThe cohort included 1842 patients with a median follow-up time of 529 days (range 2-1459 days). 790 (43%) patients experienced the outcome, with 68 (8.6%) having the outcome within 30 days. The final risk model included 12 variables, of which 8 were identified as being dominant. The top predictors with >99% probability for model inclusion were increasing age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11/5 years), prior HF-diagnoses (1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.71) and lower discharge haemoglobin (1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15/10 g/L). Other predictors (~>60% model-selection probability) included lower admitting systolic blood pressure, higher loop-diuretic discharge requirements, persistent smoking, an admitting non-sinus rhythm and absence of discharge angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor prescription. The 3-year cross-validated c-statistic was 0.63 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.65).
conclusionsA clinically oriented prognostic model with moderate discrimination, to predict adverse events postdischarge for HF, has been developed and internally validated. This model, leveraging an integrated approach to selection, shows promise in personalising discharge planning. Future external validation is necessary to confirm its applicability and potential impact on clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.