ArticleBMJ open2025
Attitudes towards euthanasia and assisted suicide: a cross-sectional study among physicians in Estonia.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to analyse the attitudes of physicians working in Estonia towards the legalisation of euthanasia and assisted suicide, their willingness to perform these practices and the association of these factors with a range of physician characteristics.
designCross-sectional study design using a web-based anonymous questionnaire comprising 31 questions or statements.
settingEstonia, April-October 2022; data collection via a web-based survey of physicians.
participants526 physicians (74% female, 49% under 40 years old). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the attitudes of Estonian physicians towards the legalisation of euthanasia and assisted suicide. Secondary outcomes included their self-reported willingness to personally perform euthanasia and their willingness to personally assist in suicide.
resultsMost of the participants (73%) agreed that euthanasia and assisted suicide should be legal in Estonia. Non-religious physicians were significantly more likely to support both (OR 8.0; 95% CI: 3.8, 16.8 for euthanasia; OR 9.7; 95% CI: 4.7, 20.2 for assisted suicide). Physicians who attended palliative care courses were less likely to support euthanasia (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.8). Over half had not participated in any specialised palliative medicine courses.
conclusionsThis research indicates that the Estonian physician community demonstrates a predominantly accepting view of the legalisation of euthanasia and assisted suicide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.