ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Wildflower strip establishment supports beneficial ground-dwelling arthropods and pest control but has limited effects on weed seed control and spillover to adjacent fields.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Wildflower strip establishment supports beneficial ground-dwelling arthropods and pest control but has limited effects on weed seed control and spillover to adjacent fields.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arthropod declines in agricultural landscapes can threaten biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Wildflower strips (WFS) can support biodiversity and, despite the mostly positive effects on pollinators and predatory arthropods, myriapods and ecosystem services like weed seed and ground-level pest predation are less studied. In addition, time after WFS establishment is highly relevant, but most experiments are performed in a single season. Here, we evaluated the effects of WFS on ground-dwelling arthropods (carabids, spiders and myriapods) and ecosystem services (pest and weed seed predation) across three years and three crop types. Using a standardized experimental design with paired control and WFS margins in 12 fields, we assessed arthropods and ecosystem services and their spillover into adjacent fields. We found that WFS enhanced spider and carabid richness and total and rodent pest predation in all crop types, whereas benefits on carabid activity-density and insect predation were only observed at certain crops. Spillover patterns were weak, and only carabids were enhanced in parts of the field neighbouring WFS. The benefits of two-year-old WFS reinforce the important role of perennial WFS in supporting beneficial ground-dwelling arthropod groups while also highlighting that limited spillover hinders the design of general measures to support biodiversity within arable fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.