ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Postural stability and optic flow sensitivity following sight restoration from congenital bilateral cataracts.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postural stability and optic flow sensitivity following sight restoration from congenital bilateral cataracts.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision is crucial for maintaining balance and facilitating locomotion. Optic flow, for example, provides key self-motion cues for navigation. Congenital blindness typically leads to increased postural sway and impaired navigation. Here, we investigated postural stability and optic flow sensitivity in individuals surgically treated for congenital dense bilateral cataracts years after birth. Experiment 1 assessed whether cataract-treated participants rely on vision to stabilize their stance with eyes open compared with eyes closed. Cataract-treated participants decreased their sway with open eyes to a lesser extent than controls, indicating a reduced ability to use vision for stabilization. Interestingly, participants tested longer after surgery showed less sway, suggesting partial learning in using vision to enhance stability. Experiment 2 assessed whether different radial and translational optic flow patterns elicit distinct effects on body sway, which would indicate illusory sensorimotor perceptions. We included typically sighted controls tested either with normal vision or with experimentally reduced visual acuity. While cataract-treated participants exhibited greater sway than controls, their sway was less influenced by optic flow patterns. Overall, the study showed that cataract-treated individuals exhibit partial learning in utilizing vision for stabilization and less pronounced illusory self-motion perception from optic flow compared to typically sighted individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.