ArticleBMJ global health2025
Accelerators for improved health among adolescent mothers in South Africa: HIV and violence prevention, sexual reproductive health and education success.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food insecurity among adolescent girls who are mothers (10-19 years) in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Accelerating achievement for Africa's adolescents.Contemporary social science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background30% of girls in Africa are mothers, facing high risk for negative health and educational outcomes. We aimed to identify services with the potential to reduce multiple simultaneous risks for adolescent mothers, described by the UN as 'development accelerators'.
methodsAdolescent mothers (n=1044) from South Africa completed questionnaires between 2017/2019 and 2020/2023, assessing mental health, HIV risks, violence victimisation, education access and hypothesised 'accelerators'. We used multivariable random effects regression models, adjusting for covariates. Predicted probabilities (marginal effects) were estimated to determine how each identified accelerator, and their combinations, influence the probability of each outcome, offering improved interpretability into the impact of the accelerators.
resultsThree 'accelerators' showed protective associations against multiple risks: Food security was associated with reductions in age disparate/transactional sex (OR 0.56, 95% CI (0.42, 0.74)); no contraception use (OR 0.42, 95% CI (0.29, 0.60)); no school enrolment or work engagement (OR 0.46, 95% CI (0.32, 0.67)) and low self-efficacy (OR 0.62, 95% CI (0.46, 0.83)). Non-violent parenting was associated with reductions in suicidality (OR 0.20, 95% CI (0.10, 0.39)); mental health distress (OR 0.44, 95% CI (0.31, 0.64)); transactional/age disparate sex (OR 0.62, 95% CI (0.45, 0.87)); intimate partner violence (OR 0.27, 95% CI (0.14, 0.52)); and sexual violence (OR 0.21, 95% CI (0.10, 0.44)). Respectful clinics were associated with reductions in mental health distress (OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.46, 0.92)); low self-efficacy (OR 0.43, 95% CI (0.33, 0.58)) and condomless sex (OR 0.46, 95% CI (0.35, 0.61). When all three accelerators-compared with none-were provided, risks were greatly lowered. For example, suicidality from 13% to 2%; intimate partner violence from 22% to 5% and sexual violence from 11% to 1%.
conclusionsThis real-world, longitudinal cohort design study identifies services with accelerator impacts that protect adolescent mothers against multiple risks. These can be realised through improved reach of existing services to include adolescent mothers: economic support including government cash transfers, parenting programmes and adolescent-responsive healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.