Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460863›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Metachronal rowing provides robust propulsive performance across four orders of magnitude variation in Reynolds number.

Mitchell P Ford, Arvind Santhanakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mitchell P FordSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Arvind SanthanakrishnanSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1800-8361

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metachronal rowing of multiple appendages is a swimming strategy used by numerous organisms across various taxa, with body sizes ranging of the orders of [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] m. This corresponds to a huge variation in fluid flow regimes, characterized by paddle-scale Reynolds numbers ([Formula: see text]) ranging from the orders of [Formula: see text] (viscosity dominated) to [Formula: see text] (inertially dominated). Though the rhythmic stroking of the paddles is conserved across species and developmental stages, the hydrodynamic scalability of metachronal rowing has not been examined across this broad [Formula: see text] range. Using a self-propelled metachronal paddling robot, we examine swimming performance changes across four orders of magnitude variation in [Formula: see text] most relevant to crustaceans ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]). We found that wake Strouhal number ([Formula: see text]), which characterizes momentum transfer from paddles to the wake, was unchanged for [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). This is within the reported range of Strouhal numbers of various flying and swimming animals. Peak dimensionless circulation of paddle tip vortices increased linearly with stroke kinematics but was mostly unaffected by fluid viscosity. These findings show that the swimming performance of metachronal rowing is conserved across widely varying flow regimes, with dimensionless swimming speed scaling linearly with [Formula: see text] across the entire tested range.

Indexed as

CrustaceaModels, BiologicalSwimmingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHydrodynamicsViscositybio-inspired robotsbiological propulsioncrustaceanshydrodynamicsmetachronyswimming

Identifiers

PMID40460863
PMCPMC12133342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.